So, the 2026 World Cup has come to an end. Spain were worthy World Cup winners, overcoming an Argentina side that relied on the only tactics that ever looked likely to bring them success.
Many England fans took pleasure in seeing the team that beat them in the semi-final turn to tears after a display in which Argentina employed all the dark arts. But love or loathe them, they did what they had to do.
England versus Spain would probably have produced a better spectacle, although it may also have been far more one-sided. Had Argentina tried to match Spain in an open game, the final could easily have been even more comfortable. Their best hope was always that Messi would produce a moment of magic, or they would take the match to penalties.
It wasn’t Argentina’s fault in the semi-final that when 1-0 down and Messi hardly having a worthwhile kick, England committed tactical suicide and offered them a golden opportunity. The Three Lions gave them the only chance they had by defending so stupidly, more of which later.
Talking of Messi. There's a reason Messi is playing in MLS rather than one of Europe's elite leagues, just as Cristiano Ronaldo and Ivan Toney are in Saudi Arabia. In my view, at this stage of their careers, they are no longer at that level. Yet teams, in the case of Messi, stood off him, paralysed by fear rather than denying him space, the one way he could still cause havoc.
Messi received lots of vitriol throughout the tournament. It was claimed he was getting preferential treatment from FIFA with lots of memes and cartoons on the go. I don’t think he did, although he could easily have received a red card in his opening game. I think the reason for his dislike is that his career can be split into two.
The two Messi Careers
The first half was when everyone loved the young genius at Barcelona, who was selfless and always got up after a challenge; then came post-2020. Lionel Scaloni had been appointed as Argentina's head coach, and Diego Maradona passed away.
Until then, many Argentinians had little time for Messi. He never played pro football in the nation of his birth, with many considering him Spanish. He was too nice for the national psyche, whereas Maradona was loved because he would do anything to win and create national pride. The pride that perhaps explains the ill-judged Malvinas banner after the England game.
Anyone wanting to understand Argentine football, how much it matters, and why they are the way they are should watch the outstanding Once in a Lifetime YouTube series surrounding the 2022 World Cup.
To cut to the chase, Scaloni got Messi to become nastier, show more passion and integrate with the team. His popularity grew, becoming the type of player Argentinians admire. Which brings me very neatly around to England.
England, Dear England
As a nation, we English are much more reserved. Anyone who resorts to foul play is quickly vilified, which is nice, but not much use when it comes to games against those who’ll do anything to win. Especially against South American teams, when a weaker or less experienced referee takes control.
That’s because the best refs are from South America or Europe and are unlikely to be appointed. FIFA usually appoint an American, African or Asian to avoid being accused of being biased. For what it’s worth, I thought the refs did OK in the semi-final or final for their ability range.
England is missing fighters and leaders in this team, aside from Jude Bellingham. Players who upset the opposition and their supporters. They seem to be a lovely bunch who are polite to the media. The media, who incidentally then stab them in the back at the earliest opportunity.
Where’s the Fight?
It’s very similar when England play Australia in the Ashes as when England play Argentina at football. Winning at sport matters massively. Two sporting rivals with plenty of historical baggage, wanting to put one over their enemy. England either allow it to happen or then spend their time whingeing about it afterwards. Why? I think the English are pampered.
In cricket, they are likely to be from educational establishments with all the facilities, and in football, the kids are picked up at an early age and given huge riches along with their parents, meaning they don’t know the meaning of fighting for anything.
Thousands more spend years in money-making academies. Restrictions on how much football youngsters can play have also contributed to the decline of local leagues. That feels utterly nonsensical.
Compare that to the kids from barrio slums who fight and scrap for the chance to earn a professional contract, and then once more if they want to earn big money in Europe. Is there any wonder it’s ingrained in them once they play for their country? Go to any Spanish city on a Saturday, find a local club, and you’ll see games from 8 am to 10 pm at a venue with excellent facilities.
The Cossetted Academy Kids
I don’t know whether it’s what English kids are taught in the academies or their attitudes, but something is wrong. England seems to produce lots of “ballers” but not enough winners. Right through to the national team, players love doing the things that get noticed but don't knuckle down and do the basics and the unglamorous work properly.
There is a lack of leaders who want to grab games by the scruff of the neck and hand out rough, honest feedback. I’ve seen it so often following non-league football around London. Loads of young players listing huge pro clubs in their pen-pics, despite maybe being at their academy for a couple of years.
They believe the hype and flounce if they are put on the subs bench, moving to another club within a few weeks rather than fighting for their place and proving a point. Incredibly, some players in the 8th tier of English football have agents. No wonder they’re not rounded. They’re more worried about cash and ego.
Incidentally, I feel the FA could help. Why name more substitutes than are eligible to play? I simply don't see the point. It wastes money, drains resources, and denies opportunities to others.
Tuchel Dilemma
Anyway, back to England. Third place in the World Cup shouldn’t be sniffed at, but a great chance was tossed away. I was between being livid and heartbroken. Why those substitutions? Why the lack of leadership and nous among the players? Maybe I’ve highlighted some of the reasons in my previous paragraphs?
The day after the semi-final, I wanted the FA to sack Thomas Tuchel. I have mellowed to a degree, and not because of the 6-4 victory over France, enjoyable though it was, but some of the answers that it offered.
One question is who could replace him? Many tout Eddie Howe, a man whose Newcastle United side threw away 27 points from winning positions, making them the worst team in the league at holding onto leads. Like Gareth Southgate, I think Eddie Howe is a better person than he is a manager.
Needing a New Kane
Harry Kane has been a magnificent servant for England. However, the signs were there at Euro 24. He could be excused slightly because of a back injury, but now it’s clear that his legs have gone. Tuchel must look for new options, whether that’s one player or a change in formation.
Ivan Toney and Ollie Watkins showed why the coach wouldn’t replace Harry Kane, who has become somewhat of a sacred cow. Neither is up to the task. But at least they remained in their position, rather than wandering off like a frustrated quarterback, so the team kept its shape and had the option of an out ball.
Pace Kills
Pace wins games and terrifies opponents. Not just by how fast players run, but also by their speed of thought, which is arguably as important. In the France consolation game, Elliott Anderson’s and Kane’s omissions saw England play on the front foot with pace. Declan Rice looked like a different player with Eberechi Eze alongside him.
Lo and behold, after several substitutions, England nearly threw away a 4-0 lead, at times with all 11 men behind the ball until Bellingham decided he’d had enough and showed why he’s the one player who would have walked into England's Italia '90 side – another who should have won the World Cup. But who was shouting at the players to push up?
The Future
Tuchel has most of the resources he requires if he stops being stubborn and picks talented players rather than those who make for a comfy environment. Maybe try Rashford and Saka through the middle or hope someone emerges from the age-group sides. Whoever it is needs to be athletic, brave and disciplined enough to hold their position. Build around players who can keep possession, such as Palmer and Foden. Perhaps it's time to consider a 4-4-2 or even a 3-5-2.
England's next test comes against the newly crowned world champions, Spain, at Wembley in September in the Nations League. Whether Thomas Tuchel is still in charge remains to be seen. If he is, we'll soon discover whether the lessons of this World Cup have truly been learned.

.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)






.png)
.png)
.png)

.jpg)




.png)
